Address by Hon’ble MOS (IC), CA, F&PD
(Consultation with Food Ministers of States/UTs on NFSB;
13th February, 2013)
Food Ministers and Food Secretaries of States
and Union Territories, Secretary, Deptt. of Food and Public Distribution,
senior officers of Central Ministries and Departments, other distinguished
guests, friends from media, ladies and gentlemen.
We have assembled today to discuss and give
final shape to a historic and path-breaking initiative of the Government, which
seeks to ensure food security in a rights based manner. After a wide ranging
process of consultation, including consultation with States on more than one
occasion, the Government introduced the National Food Security Bill in the Lok
Sabha in December, 2011. The Bill was thereafter examined in detail by the
Standing Committee, which has now given its recommendations. We need to
fianlise our views on these recommendations early, give a final shape to the
Bill and present it back to the Parliament for consideration and passage in the
ensuing Budget Session, so that the people of this country are ensured of its
benefits at the earliest.
States/UTs have been our partners in
implementation of TPDS and a great deal of role is envisaged for you in
implementation of the Food Security Act. Your views therefore are extremely
important for us before finalising the Bill. It is for this reason that we have
convened this meeting.
The Committee, during its process of
examination of the Bill, interacted with a large variety of people and organisations,
representing different shades of opinion. It also visited States to hear out
their views. Recommendations of the Committee are guided by the need for the
Act to be simpler for ease of its implementation. It also attempts to address
many of the concerns of States/UT. Overall, the approach suggested by the
Committee appears practical, simple and easy to implement. Still, there are
certain aspects which need to be discussed before taking a final view.
As stated by the Secretary (Food), the
Standing Committee has made many recommendations. However, those relating to
coverage under TPDS, identification of beneficiaries, entitlement to foodgrains
and their prices are the principal ones, which require careful consideration.
There are divergent views on each of these issues and the challenge before us
today is to arrive at a workable, practical and equitable approach, keeping the
larger objective of the Bill in mind. The Committee has also made certain
recommendations on sharing of the additional expenditure arising out of
implementation of the Bill. In their comments on the original Bill, many State
Governments had raised this issue and expressed their inability to bear the
additional burden especially on items such as transportation, handling &
FPS dealers’ margin and the grievance redressal mechanism at the District and
State levels. Committee has kept in mind the concerns of State Governments and
made its recommendations accordingly.
As we move from a welfare approach on food
security to a rights based approach, the issue of grievance redressal assumes
great importance. The Bill provided for a three tire independent grievance
redressal mechanism. Keeping the concerns of States/UTs on additional
expenditure required to be borne by them, the Committee has recommended that
States/UTs should be allowed to use existing machinery for grievance redressal.
In this background, I would be
particularly interested in hearing the views of State Governments on the kind
of institutional structure that the Food Security Act should have in order to
ensure that the entitlements reach the intended beneficiaries and those
responsible for delivery of benefits are held accountable in case they fail to
do so.
The Committee has also recommended that the
Act should provide for allowing States/UTs, a reasonable time limit, which
could be one year, within which they will be required to complete the
preparatory work, at the end of which the Act will come into force in all
States. If any State/UT is in a position to implement the Act earlier than the
stipulated time, they may do so. This is a valid recommendation, as
preparedness to implement the Act varies from State to State. However, I would
urge States/UTs to utilise this window of one year to strengthen TPDS including
intermediate storage facilities at all levels in order to be able to
successfully implement the Act. I seek personal attention of State Food
Ministers to ensure time-bound accomplishment of certain critical components of
strengthening such as elimination of bogus ration cards, door step delivery,
first phase of computerisation of TPDS,
setting up or strengthening of State Civil Supplies Corporations, setting up of
Vigilance Committees and ensuring their regular meetings etc. As you are aware, the Supreme Court has also
from time to time passed orders for strengthening of TPDS on which States/UTs
are also required to file their responses.
As mentioned earlier, we intend to present
the revised Bill in Parliament in the forthcoming Budget Session and therefore
this is last opportunity for consultation before finalising the Bill. I look
forward to hear your views on recommendations of the Standing Committee and
seek active cooperation in successful implementation of the Food Security Act.
Friends, now a detailed presentation will be
made on recommendations of the Standing Committee, with particular reference to
the issues that I have specifically mentioned above, i.e. issues of coverage,
identification, entitlement, prices as well as sharing of expenditure, where
the views of the State Govts. are crucial.
With these words, I welcome you once again
and thank you for your participation.